US consumers willing to pay more for 2nd generation biofuels than conventional fuel, study finds
Consumers are willing to pay more for second-generation biofuels than conventional fuel, according to a new study from Washington State University.
In fact, the study found that consumers are willing to pay 11% more over traditional fuel.
“We were surprised the premium was that significant,” said Jill McCluskey, WSU professor in the School of Economic Sciences. “We wanted to study people in different regions of the country, to make sure we weren’t just getting a local result, and people in all three cities we studied said they would pay more for these fuels.”
The paper, “Consumer Preferences for Second-Generation Bioethanol,” was published in November in the journal Energy Economics.
First-generation biofuels use potential food sources, like corn, which can cause the price of food to rise. Second generation biofuels, on the other hand, are made from sustainable biological non-food sources. Recently, Alaska Airlines flew a plane from Seattle to Washington, D.C., fuelled by second generation biofuel made from wood scraps.
'Potential market for it'
McCluskey’s study was part of a grant from the National Science Foundation headed by Shulin Chen, WSU professor in the Department of Biological Systems Engineering. Chen, who researches new biofuels, asked McCluskey to find out whether people would buy second-generation biofuels.
“This new biofuel doesn’t exist commercially yet, so we have to do these studies to make sure there’s a potential market for it,” McCluskey said. “And this shows there clearly is a market.”
McCluskey and her co-author, recent WSU Ph.D. graduate Tongzhe Li, conducted surveys in Portland, Ore., Minneapolis and Boston. In Portland, the average amount participants would pay for second-generation biofuel over conventional fuel was 17%, while in Minneapolis and Boston the averages were 9% and 8%, respectively.
“People in the survey were concerned that the new fuel may put their car at risk, by not running the same as conventional fuel,” she said. “But they also saw the added benefit to the environment.”
The researchers asked participants if they would be willing to pay a certain amount for the product. If they said no, researchers offered a discount and asked if participants would pay that amount. However, if respondents said yes, researchers asked if they would be willing to pay a little more for the product.
Before they were surveyed, half of the participants were given information about second generation biofuels. Those participants were more willing to pay a greater premium, which suggests that marketing the benefits of the new biofuels would improve consumers’ perceptions, McCluskey said.